In practice and to the detriment of the seller who receives a settlement, it appears that parties to an out-of-court settlement are often not informed of the VAT treatment on compensation and, as such, do not take into account the VAT component in the agreement or agreement. If the transaction agreement does not specify whether the compensation is included or VAT-free, the compensation is considered to be VAT included at the standard rate of 15% within the meaning of Section 64 of the VAT Act. The supplier seller, i.e. the recipient of the payment, is therefore obliged to pay VAT and cannot recover the amount of VAT from the other party in addition to the compensation already agreed under the transaction agreement. This is in line with the approach taken so far by our courts, which have found that the VAT obligation applies to the supplier seller and not to the recipient with regard to a turnover for which VAT must be paid. Depending on the previous position, a comparison might be possible with respect to multiple claims, for which some compensation was DETABLE and some could not cause problems. This was a proven method of clearly distributing and spelling the VATable and non-VATable elements of the billing amount, otherwise HMRC might consider the entire payment to be a single compound delivery (probably DETABLE). Since the press release, very few cases have been brought to VAT headquarters. Notable exceptions were Cooper Chasney LON/89/1409Z (VATSC06834) and Edenroc LON/88/1047X (VATSC06170). Customs and excise duties found both decisions to be consistent with the press release. Local offices looked into the applications. However, the Law Society considered that the absence of pending cases could indicate ignorance of the potential pitfalls in which transaction elements could result in VAT debt.
The Commissioners of Customs - Excise have reviewed their VAT payment processing policy as part of the out-of-court settlement of disputes, after the proceedings have been initiated by the service of an original procedure (or the appointment of an arbitrator). Where is the place of supply? If it is not the United Kingdom, the UK VAT is not relevant. The usual rules apply here, i.e. if a German manufacturer. B of auto parts pays a British brand a reference amount for defective parts of cars sold in the United States, the place of delivery (if any) Is Germany and it is German (non-British or American) VAT legislation that is at stake. If the VAT transaction contract is silent, the payment is considered to be included by VAT when it is provided for services provided. As a result, the seller who receives such a payment is responsible for VAT on the amount of compensation equal to the creditor`s tax share, so that the beneficiary falls out of his wallet and ultimately charged for less. The 82/87 press release was issued with the aim of limiting its application to actual litigation. When a settlement agreement was drafted so that the plaintiff had the right to sue the defendant for a sum of money, it was not a delivery.